<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[RiverandReef.com - Articles - ]]></title>
		<link>http://www.riverandreef.com/articlelive</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Fly fishing around the world in all waters]]></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.riverandreef.com/articlelive]]></copyright>
		<generator>N/A</generator>
		<webMaster>info@gofishaustralia.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:45:04 CST</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>20</ttl>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DT vs WF Which is really better?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.riverandreef.com/articlelive/articles/26/1/DT-vs-WF-Which-is-really-better/Page1.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Few fly line subjects have been discussed more than which is the better taper, double taper (DT) or weight forward (WF). The answer is, neither is inherently better, but one may be better than the other for you.<br />
<br />
A lot of generalizations are made about these two tapers based on outdated or incorrect information. We’ve all heard that DT lines are more delicate, give better control, roll cast better, etc. In some cases some of these things are true, but not always.]]></description>
			<author>no@spam.com (Bruce Richards of Scientific Anglers/3M)</author>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 CST]]></pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.riverandreef.com/articlelive/articles/26/1/DT-vs-WF-Which-is-really-better/Page1.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>